What could possibly be going on in the mind of Susanne Ibru, allegedly a scion of the famous Ibru Family of Delta State, who has been jailed for stalking Rio Ferdinand? Is she coo-coo or simply taking her admiration too far? Here's their story:
A woman who repeatedly turned up at the home of Premiership footballer Rio Ferdinand told him: 'I'll see you soon' as she was convicted of harassment yesterday.
But Susanne Ibru, 38, disappeared from court before sentencing, having cross-examined the Manchester United player herself.
Under her questioning Ferdinand had told the court that he felt 'angry and upset' by her appearances at his Cheshire property.
She had twice disturbed the Manchester United player and his wife while they were asleep, claiming she needed to speak to him, the court heard.
As he left the witness box following the grilling, she said to him: 'I'll see you soon, bye.'
However, after being told Ferdinand's wife Rebecca, 30, was excused from giving evidence today after giving birth to their third child at the weekend she left the court without warning.
Ibru was convicted at Macclesfield Magistrates' Court in her absence.
A warrant was issued for Ibru by District Judge Nicholas Sanders, who asked for her to be brought back before him for sentencing.
He said it was 'quite clear' to him that the prosecution case against her was proved.
He said: 'Mr Ferdinand is a high-profile footballer and whilst there will always be occasions where he is exposed to public and press scrutiny, the fact is that when he is in the privacy of his own home with his family he has a right to expect to be left alone.'
Maddox Ojimadu's Blog!!!
The Musings of The Son of The Noble One.
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
Another Dimension Of The Ivorian Crisis. What Do You Think?
Here is a dissenting view of events in Ivory Coast. What Do you think?
Here's another example of the mainstream media completely hiding the real reasons for a conflict from the masses. I could be kind and say they're just stupid, or I could be correct and say they're terrified of what will happen when people know the truth. If you knew that the Ivory Coast in 1957 had about a 20% Muslim population and that today it is over 50%. If you then knew that the supposedly democratically elected new leader is Muslim while the old one is Christian, do you think those facts might be important? Have you heard that on the news?
And if anyone can find any mention of the Islam vs Christianity element of this civil war on the news, do let me know.
There is a civil war in the Ivory Coast between Muslims and Christians. Unsurprisingly the EU has chosen to back the Muslim side. France is using armed force to insure that the Muslims take over.
Islam came to the Ivory Coast via Berber slave traders. Now it is trying to take over with mass murder and the backing of the 'international community'. The post-colonial Ivory Coast was a success story. But Muslim immigration has turned it into a nightmare.
The media narrative on the Cote D'Ivorie crisis is that Muslim thug Alassane Ouattarra is the legitimately elected leader of the country. But Alassane Ouattarra had a Birther problem of his own. Under Ivory Coast law, the president and his parents have to be native born. Alassane Ouattarra was born in the Ivory Coast, but his father wasn't. That legally disqualified him from holding office. He tried for it anyway despite a Supreme Court ruling barring him.
Ouattarra tried to present forged documents, resulting in a warrant for his arrest. He ran for office yet again. But this time he brought large numbers of Muslim immigrants who were not legally qualified to vote to the polls. Numerically he won, but the invalid votes were thrown out by the Constitutional Council. The 'international community' chose to back Ouattarra, who had no legal right to even stand for office, and his illegal Muslim voters. Now they're doing everything possible to put him in power.
Let's be clear about what is going on here. Gbago is no saint-- few African leaders are. But Alassane Ouattarra and his Muslim thugs are trying to turn the Ivory Coast into another Sudan filled with the bodies of Christians and Animists. Backing an Ouattarra takeover means backing another Muslim genocide against Christians and Animists.
The Obama Administration has pushed for the replacement of Gbago with Ouattarra. The UN has used mostly unproven war crimes allegations, that smack of events in Yugoslavia, to conduct a war to put Ouattarra and his Muslim thugs in power. Meanwhile the UN did not intervene military when Muslims were engaged in genocide in Sudan. UN peacekeepers serve as Ouattara's private bodyguard.
Despite all the lies about acting on behalf of Ivorians-- the UN is acting on behalf of Muslims. On behalf of Ouattara and the Muslim immigrants drawn by the wealth of Côte d'Ivoire.
The numbers tell the tale. In 1957, Muslims barely made up 20 percent of the country. In the 90's, they were already half the country. The boom has come from migrant workers. Many of whom were enlisted to vote for Ouattara.
This civil war hinges on the question of whether Muslim immigrants should be allowed to take over the Côte d'Ivoire. The UN says yes. Obama says yes. France says yes. But this is a preview of coming attractions for Europe and America as well.
And if anyone can find any mention of the Islam vs Christianity element of this civil war on the news, do let me know.
There is a civil war in the Ivory Coast between Muslims and Christians. Unsurprisingly the EU has chosen to back the Muslim side. France is using armed force to insure that the Muslims take over.
Islam came to the Ivory Coast via Berber slave traders. Now it is trying to take over with mass murder and the backing of the 'international community'. The post-colonial Ivory Coast was a success story. But Muslim immigration has turned it into a nightmare.
The media narrative on the Cote D'Ivorie crisis is that Muslim thug Alassane Ouattarra is the legitimately elected leader of the country. But Alassane Ouattarra had a Birther problem of his own. Under Ivory Coast law, the president and his parents have to be native born. Alassane Ouattarra was born in the Ivory Coast, but his father wasn't. That legally disqualified him from holding office. He tried for it anyway despite a Supreme Court ruling barring him.
Ouattarra tried to present forged documents, resulting in a warrant for his arrest. He ran for office yet again. But this time he brought large numbers of Muslim immigrants who were not legally qualified to vote to the polls. Numerically he won, but the invalid votes were thrown out by the Constitutional Council. The 'international community' chose to back Ouattarra, who had no legal right to even stand for office, and his illegal Muslim voters. Now they're doing everything possible to put him in power.
Let's be clear about what is going on here. Gbago is no saint-- few African leaders are. But Alassane Ouattarra and his Muslim thugs are trying to turn the Ivory Coast into another Sudan filled with the bodies of Christians and Animists. Backing an Ouattarra takeover means backing another Muslim genocide against Christians and Animists.
The Obama Administration has pushed for the replacement of Gbago with Ouattarra. The UN has used mostly unproven war crimes allegations, that smack of events in Yugoslavia, to conduct a war to put Ouattarra and his Muslim thugs in power. Meanwhile the UN did not intervene military when Muslims were engaged in genocide in Sudan. UN peacekeepers serve as Ouattara's private bodyguard.
Despite all the lies about acting on behalf of Ivorians-- the UN is acting on behalf of Muslims. On behalf of Ouattara and the Muslim immigrants drawn by the wealth of Côte d'Ivoire.
The numbers tell the tale. In 1957, Muslims barely made up 20 percent of the country. In the 90's, they were already half the country. The boom has come from migrant workers. Many of whom were enlisted to vote for Ouattara.
This civil war hinges on the question of whether Muslim immigrants should be allowed to take over the Côte d'Ivoire. The UN says yes. Obama says yes. France says yes. But this is a preview of coming attractions for Europe and America as well.
Radical Muslims in Africa's Ivory Coast, with the military backing of the United Nations and France, are perpetrating a massacre on the country's Christians while the Obama administration stands by and does nothing.
Now, Ivory Coast President-elect Alassane Ouattara's largely Muslim forces have kept Christian Laurent Gbagbo, the current president, in his Abidjan residence under siege.
In retaliation, Gbagbo forces launched two mortars and a rocket at the residence of the French ambassador and French helicopter gunships responded by attacking Gbagbo forces, according to Bloomberg Businessweek.
In a report issued last week, Human Rights Watch documented that forces loyal to Ouattara killed hundreds of civilians and raped more than 20 alleged Gbagbo supporters as they burned at least 10 villages in the Ivory Coast's western region.
"People interviewed by Human Rights Watch described how, in village after village, pro-Ouattara forces, now called the Republican forces of Cote d'Ivorie (Forces Republicaines Cote d'Ivorie, FRCI) summarily executed and raped Gbagbo supporters in their homes, as they worked in the fields, as they fled, or as they tried to hide in the bush," the report noted. "The fighters often targeted people by ethnicity, and the attacks disproportionately affected those too old or feeble to flee."
On Saturday, reports from the Ivory Coast published by the London Evening Standard indicate that more than 200 bodies, some of them burned alive, have been found in the country.
The newspaper reported the concern of the International Rescue Committee that even if the military showdown in Abidjan were to end, the looting, hostility, bloodshed, reprisal killings and sexual assaults will continue to escalate in communities across the country.
The silence of the Obama administration on the violence in the Ivory Coast makes hypocritical the president's declaration in his May 28 speech on Libya that U.S. military action there was necessary to prevent a massacre by Gadhafi that "would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world."
The truth is that Obama, like the French and the U.N., support the radical Muslims that have taken over the "rebel forces" in Libya, just as Obama, the French and the U.N. support the Muslims in the Ivory Coast trying to remove from power the current Christian president, even if the Muslim supporters of Ouattara engage in massacres and mass rape against Christians.
What the Ivory Coast situation makes clear is that the consistency in the Obama administration's policy regarding the turmoil in North Africa is that Obama directs U.S. policy to support radical Islam, even to the point of being hypocritical in arguing United States policy is motivated by a desire to protect human rights and prevent massacre in the various ongoing conflicts in countries including the Ivory Coast and Libya.
This is the ugly truth the mainstream media in the United States will never openly report.
Now, Ivory Coast President-elect Alassane Ouattara's largely Muslim forces have kept Christian Laurent Gbagbo, the current president, in his Abidjan residence under siege.
In retaliation, Gbagbo forces launched two mortars and a rocket at the residence of the French ambassador and French helicopter gunships responded by attacking Gbagbo forces, according to Bloomberg Businessweek.
In a report issued last week, Human Rights Watch documented that forces loyal to Ouattara killed hundreds of civilians and raped more than 20 alleged Gbagbo supporters as they burned at least 10 villages in the Ivory Coast's western region.
"People interviewed by Human Rights Watch described how, in village after village, pro-Ouattara forces, now called the Republican forces of Cote d'Ivorie (Forces Republicaines Cote d'Ivorie, FRCI) summarily executed and raped Gbagbo supporters in their homes, as they worked in the fields, as they fled, or as they tried to hide in the bush," the report noted. "The fighters often targeted people by ethnicity, and the attacks disproportionately affected those too old or feeble to flee."
On Saturday, reports from the Ivory Coast published by the London Evening Standard indicate that more than 200 bodies, some of them burned alive, have been found in the country.
The newspaper reported the concern of the International Rescue Committee that even if the military showdown in Abidjan were to end, the looting, hostility, bloodshed, reprisal killings and sexual assaults will continue to escalate in communities across the country.
The silence of the Obama administration on the violence in the Ivory Coast makes hypocritical the president's declaration in his May 28 speech on Libya that U.S. military action there was necessary to prevent a massacre by Gadhafi that "would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world."
The truth is that Obama, like the French and the U.N., support the radical Muslims that have taken over the "rebel forces" in Libya, just as Obama, the French and the U.N. support the Muslims in the Ivory Coast trying to remove from power the current Christian president, even if the Muslim supporters of Ouattara engage in massacres and mass rape against Christians.
What the Ivory Coast situation makes clear is that the consistency in the Obama administration's policy regarding the turmoil in North Africa is that Obama directs U.S. policy to support radical Islam, even to the point of being hypocritical in arguing United States policy is motivated by a desire to protect human rights and prevent massacre in the various ongoing conflicts in countries including the Ivory Coast and Libya.
This is the ugly truth the mainstream media in the United States will never openly report.
The West had insisted that Ivory Coast could be reconciled, reunified and essentially saved by means of democratic elections, such is their faith in 'democracy' and the inherent goodness of man. In reality, the divisions are so profound and the stakes are so high that, unless genuine reconciliation occurred first, elections could only trigger conflict. Elections were held on 28 November 2010, with both Gbagbo and Ouattara claiming victory. The US, European Union and African Union have recognised Ouattara as the winner and called for Gbagbo to respect democracy and step down. Russia meanwhile is blocking a UN statement that would recognise Ouatarra, saying that this is not the UN's role. Ivory Coast's non-Muslims are traumatised, fearing that their homeland -- once the most prosperous 'Christian' nation in West Africa, home to the region's largest cathedral, home-base to most of West Africa's regional Christian ministries -- is about to come under Muslim political domination.
Sunday, 27 March 2011
The World Will End On May 21 2011!!!!!!!
The folks at familyradio.com say the world will come to an end starting May 21. The thing annoying me the most is that despite the immediacy of their prophesy they're still asking for donations on their website. Wetin they wan do with the kudi after May 21 2011????
Here are excerpts fro their website:
In 2 Peter 3:8, which is quoted above, Holy God reminds us that one day is as 1,000 years. Therefore, with the correct understanding that the seven days referred to in Genesis 7:4 can be understood as 7,000 years, we learn that when God told Noah there were seven days to escape worldwide destruction, He was also telling the world there would be exactly 7,000 years (one day is as 1,000 years) to escape the wrath of God that would come when He destroys the world on Judgment Day. Because Holy Infinite God is all-knowing, He knows the end from the beginning. He knew how sinful the world would become.
Seven thousand years after 4990 B.C. (the year of the Flood) is the year 2011 A.D. (our calendar).
4990 + 2011 – 1 = 7,000
[One year must be subtracted in going from an Old Testament B.C. calendar date to a New Testament A.D. calendar date because the calendar does not have a year zero.]
Thus Holy God is showing us by the words of 2 Peter 3:8 that He wants us to know that exactly 7,000 years after He destroyed the world with water in Noah’s day, He plans to destroy the entire world forever. Because the year 2011 A.D. is exactly 7,000 years after 4990 B.C. when the flood began, the Bible has given us absolute proof that the year 2011 is the end of the world during the Day of Judgment, which will come on the last day of the Day of Judgment.
Amazingly, May 21, 2011 is the 17th day of the 2nd month of the Biblical calendar of our day. Remember, the flood waters also began on the 17th day of the 2nd month, in the year 4990 B.C.
The Holy Bible gives several additional astounding proofs that May 21, 2011 is very accurate as the time for the Day of Judgment. For more information on this subject, you may request a copy of We Are Almost There, available free of charge from Family Radio.
God is proving to us that we have very accurately learned from the Holy Bible God’s time-plan for the end of the world.
Here are excerpts fro their website:
In 2 Peter 3:8, which is quoted above, Holy God reminds us that one day is as 1,000 years. Therefore, with the correct understanding that the seven days referred to in Genesis 7:4 can be understood as 7,000 years, we learn that when God told Noah there were seven days to escape worldwide destruction, He was also telling the world there would be exactly 7,000 years (one day is as 1,000 years) to escape the wrath of God that would come when He destroys the world on Judgment Day. Because Holy Infinite God is all-knowing, He knows the end from the beginning. He knew how sinful the world would become.
Seven thousand years after 4990 B.C. (the year of the Flood) is the year 2011 A.D. (our calendar).
4990 + 2011 – 1 = 7,000
[One year must be subtracted in going from an Old Testament B.C. calendar date to a New Testament A.D. calendar date because the calendar does not have a year zero.]
Thus Holy God is showing us by the words of 2 Peter 3:8 that He wants us to know that exactly 7,000 years after He destroyed the world with water in Noah’s day, He plans to destroy the entire world forever. Because the year 2011 A.D. is exactly 7,000 years after 4990 B.C. when the flood began, the Bible has given us absolute proof that the year 2011 is the end of the world during the Day of Judgment, which will come on the last day of the Day of Judgment.
Amazingly, May 21, 2011 is the 17th day of the 2nd month of the Biblical calendar of our day. Remember, the flood waters also began on the 17th day of the 2nd month, in the year 4990 B.C.
The Holy Bible gives several additional astounding proofs that May 21, 2011 is very accurate as the time for the Day of Judgment. For more information on this subject, you may request a copy of We Are Almost There, available free of charge from Family Radio.
God is proving to us that we have very accurately learned from the Holy Bible God’s time-plan for the end of the world.
Tuesday, 22 March 2011
Dallas Wiens, 3rd Man In U.S. to Receive Full Face Transplant.
WARNING!!! SOME READERS MAY FIND PICTURE DISTRESSING. READER DISCRETION ADVISED!!!!!!
Dallas Wiens, a 25-year-old father from Fort Worth, underwent the intensive procedure in Boston last week, the city's Brigham and Women's Hospital said Monday.
"Today's tremendous news marks a new milestone in Brigham and Women's legacy in transplant surgery," Hospital President Dr. Betsy Nabel said.
"The pioneering achievement accomplished by the entire transplant team is a gift made possible by the most selfless act one human being can do for another: organ donation."
The procedure took about 15 hours and included a team of more than 30 doctors, nurses, anesthesiologists, residents.
"This remarkable, anonymous gift is another example of the life-affirming power of organ and tissue donation," said Richard Luskin, president and CEO of New England Organ Bank.
Wiens suffered severe burns when his head touched a high-voltage wire in November 2008.
He has no memory of the incident. The contractor was helping his brother and uncle paint a church when, while high above the ground on a boom lift, he hit a power line.
"I'm told I lost control of the lift and ended up moving directly into the power lines," he said.
The accident left him in a coma for three months.
Doctors at the time were able to transfer skin and muscle from Wiens' back and thighs onto his charred skull, but they could not restore his lips or nose. The incident left him blind.
He has had nearly two dozen operations since.
"I do miss my sight," Wiens said last year. "But I miss the sensation of my face and my sense of smell the most."
The hospital approved him for the face transplant in October.
"I'm a little nervous, as you can expect, with any major procedure like this," he said before the operation. "I'm extremely excited over the possibility of just having a normal life back."
Weins had no health insurance at the time of the accident. Medicaid covered his costs initially, but eventually it dropped him when his disability payments put him over its income limits.
The Department of Defense will pay for the cost of surgery, he said. It's underwriting the transplant with the hope of eventually being able to help soldiers with severe facial injuries.
With News Wire Services
msheridan@nydailynews.com; or follow him at Twitter.com/NYDNSheridan
By Michael Sheridan
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Monday, March 21st 2011, 10:14 AM
A Texas man underwent a miraculous full face transplant last week to become only the third person in the U.S. to receive the groundbreaking medical procedure.Dallas Wiens, a 25-year-old father from Fort Worth, underwent the intensive procedure in Boston last week, the city's Brigham and Women's Hospital said Monday.
"Today's tremendous news marks a new milestone in Brigham and Women's legacy in transplant surgery," Hospital President Dr. Betsy Nabel said.
"The pioneering achievement accomplished by the entire transplant team is a gift made possible by the most selfless act one human being can do for another: organ donation."
The procedure took about 15 hours and included a team of more than 30 doctors, nurses, anesthesiologists, residents.
"This remarkable, anonymous gift is another example of the life-affirming power of organ and tissue donation," said Richard Luskin, president and CEO of New England Organ Bank.
Wiens suffered severe burns when his head touched a high-voltage wire in November 2008.
He has no memory of the incident. The contractor was helping his brother and uncle paint a church when, while high above the ground on a boom lift, he hit a power line.
"I'm told I lost control of the lift and ended up moving directly into the power lines," he said.
The accident left him in a coma for three months.
Doctors at the time were able to transfer skin and muscle from Wiens' back and thighs onto his charred skull, but they could not restore his lips or nose. The incident left him blind.
He has had nearly two dozen operations since.
"I do miss my sight," Wiens said last year. "But I miss the sensation of my face and my sense of smell the most."
The hospital approved him for the face transplant in October.
"I'm a little nervous, as you can expect, with any major procedure like this," he said before the operation. "I'm extremely excited over the possibility of just having a normal life back."
Weins had no health insurance at the time of the accident. Medicaid covered his costs initially, but eventually it dropped him when his disability payments put him over its income limits.
The Department of Defense will pay for the cost of surgery, he said. It's underwriting the transplant with the hope of eventually being able to help soldiers with severe facial injuries.
With News Wire Services
msheridan@nydailynews.com; or follow him at Twitter.com/NYDNSheridan
Monday, 21 March 2011
Bronx Pastor Charged With Raping, Impregnating 12-Year-Old Girl.
A Bronx pastor charged with raping a 12-year-old girl from his flock turned down a "sweetheart" plea deal that came with three years in prison.
Michael Clare, 38, refused the offer from prosecutors, despite "almost irrefutable proof" he impregnated the child, said Bronx Supreme Court Justice Megan Tallmer.
"He wasn't interested," Tallmer said in court Monday.
Clare's lawyer, Paul Brenner, asked the judge to consider probation instead of prison.
"I would never do that," she snapped, citing a DNA match between Clare and the victim's aborted fetus.
Clare - the married leader of the Harvest Worship Center and principal of the associated Harvest Prep school, declined comment outside court.
Authorities learned of the alleged crimes in June, when the girl, who now 15, told her parents and police that Clare had sexually preyed on her for three years.
Clare, who is free on $50,000 bond, faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted of first-degree rape at trial.
Prosecutors believe he may have victimized other young churchgoers as well.
The judge said his preaching days are probably over, though, since his name would likely be added to the state sex offender registry following any plea deal.
"I don't see how he could continue his work as a pastor," Tallmer said.
Clare's lawyer said the clergyman will be vindicated at trial.
"He turned down the plea deal because he's innocent," Brenner said.
One prosecutor said that was a mistake.
"This was a sweetheart offer considering the evidence against him," the prosecutor said. "It won't get any better from here."
Michael Clare, 38, refused the offer from prosecutors, despite "almost irrefutable proof" he impregnated the child, said Bronx Supreme Court Justice Megan Tallmer.
"He wasn't interested," Tallmer said in court Monday.
Clare's lawyer, Paul Brenner, asked the judge to consider probation instead of prison.
"I would never do that," she snapped, citing a DNA match between Clare and the victim's aborted fetus.
Clare - the married leader of the Harvest Worship Center and principal of the associated Harvest Prep school, declined comment outside court.
Authorities learned of the alleged crimes in June, when the girl, who now 15, told her parents and police that Clare had sexually preyed on her for three years.
Clare, who is free on $50,000 bond, faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted of first-degree rape at trial.
Prosecutors believe he may have victimized other young churchgoers as well.
The judge said his preaching days are probably over, though, since his name would likely be added to the state sex offender registry following any plea deal.
"I don't see how he could continue his work as a pastor," Tallmer said.
Clare's lawyer said the clergyman will be vindicated at trial.
"He turned down the plea deal because he's innocent," Brenner said.
One prosecutor said that was a mistake.
"This was a sweetheart offer considering the evidence against him," the prosecutor said. "It won't get any better from here."
NYPD Officers Hit With More Charges Stemming From 2008 Rape Case
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) – Two New York City police officers made four visits within about three hours to the apartment of a woman they are charged with raping when she needed help, prosecutors said Monday as they added to a slate of charges against the officers.
Already fighting charges including rape, burglary and official misconduct, officers Kenneth Moreno and Franklin Mata pleaded not guilty Monday to additional counts of burglary, official misconduct and falsifying business records.
The charges all stem from a December 2008 incident at an East Village apartment building, where Moreno is accused of raping the drunken, semiconscious woman while Mata acted as a lookout, CBS 2′s Tony Aiello reported.
Both officers deny the allegations. Jury selection for their trial is expected to start next week.The officers had been poised to go to trial earlier this month when Manhattan prosecutors abruptly announced that they planned to return the case to a grand jury — an unusual move so close to a trial. At the time, they declined to say why.
It became clear Monday. Prosecutors said they had found that surveillance cameras had captured the officers entering the woman’s building four times, not three, in the early hours of Dec. 7, 2008.
They initially were called to usher the 27-year-old home when she had trouble getting out of a taxi after a night out with friends. Then the officers repeatedly returned for periods of a half-hour or more, ultimately spending an hour there during their last visit, starting at 4:11 a.m., prosecutors said.
While on a meal break, “they snuck out of the precinct and went to her apartment,” Assistant District Attorney Coleen Balbert said. She said the new charges strengthened prosecutors’ case.
The officers’ lawyers said they weren’t sneaking around, and they said the new allegation of a fourth and final visit should fuel doubt about authorities’ account of the events.
Moreno’ lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, said the new timeline either contradicts authorities’ earlier statements about the time of the alleged rape or implies the officers returned after committing the alleged attack, something he suggested no one would do.
“The officers come back an hour later, after an alleged sexual assault was committed, to check up on the victim? It’s not consistent with common sense,” Tacopino told Aiello.
When the trial does take place, a taped conversation between the alleged victim and one of the officers could be key evidence.
WCBS 880′s Irene Cornell reported that wearing a wire, the woman confronted police officer Kenneth Moreno, saying she remembered getting up the stairs and sex with the officer. After she threatened to walk into the precinct and tell her story, Officer Moreno apologized, admitted that he started out helping her and that things got a little crazy.
Moreno repeatedly told the alleged victim “nothing happened,” but when she pressed and suggested she’d make a scene inside the stationhouse, he eventually said “yes” twice when she asked whether he’d used a condom, according to the recording. He then again told her they hadn’t had sex.
Tacopina has said the officer’s seemingly incriminating statements were just his efforts to mollify a woman he thought could cost him his job.
Mata’s lawyer, Edward Mandery, says his client committed no crime.
The officers were stripped of their guns and badges after the allegations were made public. Moreno, 43, has been an officer for about 19 years. Mata, who is in his late 20s, has been an officer for about five years.
If convicted of rape, the officers face up to 25 years in prison.
(TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2011 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)
Source: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/03/21/rape-trial-for-nypd-officers-delayed-by-a-week/
Sunday, 20 March 2011
Violence in Benue Takes New Turn As Onoja's Aide.
Gunmen kill Onoja’s aide in Otukpo
Uja Emmanuel Makurdi and Augustine Ehikioya, Abuja 19/03/2011 02:34:00
Narrating the incident to newsmen in his Otukpo residence, Gen. Onoja said at about 5.30 am, unknown gunmen stormed the residence of his aide, Emmanuel Ajibo, located on Ibadan Street, Otukpo, where they shot and killed him in his room.
He said the unknown gunmen immediately fled, leaving their victim in a pool of his blood. He blamed the killing on those who wanted to rule Idomaland by crook or hook.
The former military administrator of Plateau and Katsina states condemned the killing of his aide and called on the police to immediately arrest the perpetrators of the gruesome murder and bring them to justice.
The Divisional Police Officer in Otukpo, Zakari Ibrahim, confirmed the incident, saying investigation to unravel the mystery behind the killing had commenced.
Meanwhile, with preparations towards the senatorial election in top gear, the office of the Senate President, Senator David Mark, yesterday raised the alarm that his campaign train had been attacked by some armed thugs on his way to Igumale, the headquarters of Ado Local Government in Benue State.
According to a statement issued by the Director of Publicity of the David Mark Campaign Organisation, Chief Adakole Elijah, the thugs, who ambushed the train on the outskirts of Igumale, forced the convoy of Senator Mark to detour to Okpoeja, the headquarters of Okpowu Local Government.
While directing the campaign train to divert to Okpoga, Mark was quoted as saying: "The lives of members of my campaign train are important to me. I do not want to lose any of you to the assault of the minority opposition.
"We would return to Ado Local Government on a latter day when the opposition would have reasoned that elections are not won by violence. I have ordered the policemen on this entourage not to fire a shot because I have a responsibility to protect the lives of indigenes of Benue South, Benue State as well as Nigerians in general."
Chris Brown Denies Leaking Own Nude Picture.
Chris Brown disappointed over his nude photos
Los Angeles, March 20 : Singer Chris Brown says he is upset that his nude photos have leaked, triggering questions whether it was a gimmick ahead of his next album release.
"I didn't want to put pictures out; that's not my intention. A lot of people were saying, 'Yo, he leaked the pictures, he was trying to get promotion'," Brown told a radio station.
"For me, I was always a singer. So unless I'm planning on trying to do porn, I don't think I'd want to just leak my wang out to the world before my album comes out," he said.
"It was disappointing to me that it was out, because I was like, 'Man, now it's gonna (look like) a gimmick behind it. And I don't want a gimmick behind anything that I'm doing'."
Brown's naked picture surfaced in early March, which showed him posing in the buff while standing in a bathroom, reports aceshowbiz.com.
"For me, I was always a singer. So unless I'm planning on trying to do porn, I don't think I'd want to just leak my wang out to the world before my album comes out," he said.
"It was disappointing to me that it was out, because I was like, 'Man, now it's gonna (look like) a gimmick behind it. And I don't want a gimmick behind anything that I'm doing'."
Brown's naked picture surfaced in early March, which showed him posing in the buff while standing in a bathroom, reports aceshowbiz.com.
Asked if he will be more cautious, Chris said: "Nah, I'm just living life, I'm just gonna have fun. Everything's out on the table. So I'm just gonna live my life, man."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)